null

Large-loss and catastrophic-injury claims rarely become expensive because of a single event. More often, exposure grows because the significance of the claim is identified too late. By the time liability issues, medical complexities, or future-loss exposures are realised, key opportunities to gather evidence and determine liability could be missed.

Early legal intervention, in this regard, has become an increasingly important component of large loss claims management. It helps insurers make informed decisions with earlier insight into liability and potential future losses. "The earlier a claim is properly assessed, the greater the opportunity to influence the outcome," says Leanne Thomson, Partner, Strata Solicitors, a Gallagher Bassett Company. "This is possible when legal advisers, rehabilitation providers, and investigators proactively work together toward the same goal from the onset."

Building an effective strategy at the beginning of the claims lifecycle provides clarity and gives insurers the broadest range of options to defend the claim. This approach is informed by specialists like Leanne, who highlights the importance of proactive assessments, evidence collection, and collaboration to strengthen the defence.

“

The value of evidence lies in its immediacy. Key contemporaneous evidence, including CCTV footage, telematics data, witness evidence, and accident reports, should be secured as quickly as possible.

Leanne Thomson, Partner, Strata Solicitors, a Gallagher Bassett Company

The First Notification Is the Primary Exposure-Control Point

First notification is the point at which a claim may look routine while still offering the greatest scope to shape its outcome. "My view has always been that the first notification of loss (FNOL) is the point where insurers have the clearest visibility," says Leanne.

"It's often the most important stage, as the evidence is at its freshest and decisions made at this point can have the greatest impact on the eventual outcome."

Determining whether the circumstances indicate disputed liability, serious injury, or future losses at this juncture could transform the value of the claim.

Some of the most expensive claims may not appear catastrophic at the outset. An apparently modest injury may later develop into chronic pain, leading to time away from work and extended treatment, resulting in a much larger future-loss claim. Identifying injuries that can become catastrophic gives the legal and claims teams a basis for deciding when to bring in specialist advice and whether the initial reserve reflects the potential severity of the injury and future loss.

"Making an accurate assessment of the liability will help in determining the nature of the claim," adds Thomson. Liability disputes or complex accident circumstances can alter the defence strategy, the timing of rehabilitation and the insurer's approach to resolution.

Misclassification of a claim at this stage results in higher costs. It can lead to delayed rehabilitation, prolonging recovery timelines and depleting reserves due to increased exposure.

Conversely, identifying the potential of a claim to develop complications due to severe injury allows insurers to investigate the facts, test liability and causation, identify recovery needs, and choose a strategy before costs escalate.

Evidence as the Foundation for Early Legal Strategy

Once a claim has been identified as potentially significant, evidence plays a crucial role in building a legal position. "The value of evidence lies in its immediacy," says Thomson. "Key contemporaneous evidence, including CCTV footage, telematics data, witness evidence, and accident reports, should be secured as quickly as possible." A reliable account of the incident allows the claims and legal team to test causation and, in some cases, negligence before assumptions become embedded in the legal strategy.

In transport and public liability claims, reviews of CCTV footage, witness accounts, and the circumstances of the accident can confirm whether the allegations are true. This analysis directly informs whether liability should be admitted, contested, or apportioned. It can also support a more credible reserve by replacing a broad worst-case assumption with an evidence-led view of the probable outcome.

Reviewing medical records early can help distinguish accident-related injury from pre-existing conditions. It also provides clarity on the path to recovery and the estimated costs of rehabilitation and accommodation. For insurers, delaying this analysis until proceedings are underway means reacting to an established case rather than developing their own evidence-led position.

Escalation Triggers That Require Special Attention

The next stage is to distinguish a claim arising from injuries that can be treated immediately from one whose value may continue to grow. Focusing only on the immediate injury may cause claims teams to overlook delayed consequences that emerge months or years later, ultimately altering the total value of the claim.

Factors That Warrant Closer Scrutiny and Escalations

Injury-related indicators

  • Serious orthopaedic injuries
  • Neurological or brain injuries
  • Psychological or psychiatric injuries
  • Allegations of permanent disability

Liability and complexity indicators

  • Multiple-party liability disputes
  • Significant causation questions
  • Discrepancies between alleged injuries and objective evidence
  • Cases requiring multiple expert opinions
  • Court of Protection or deputyship involvement

Future loss indicators

  • Extended time away from work
  • Loss of earnings
  • Ongoing rehabilitation requirements
  • Long-term care or support needs

These indicators provide an idea of where lifetime cost may accumulate. They also influence settlement strategy. For instance, a claim with uncertain but potentially compounding future losses may warrant further evidence before valuation, while a claim whose trajectory is becoming clear may present an opportunity for earlier, better-informed resolution.

Rehabilitation and Expert Control Can Influence Recovery and Cost

In catastrophic injury claims, future care costs are often among the largest drivers of claim value, particularly when a claimant may require support for the remainder of their life. In addition, loss of earnings can become substantial when an individual is unable to return to their previous employment.

Collaboration between the legal and claims teams, supported by evidence, helps determine long-term care needs and potential costs. "When reserves properly reflect emerging exposure, insurers are better positioned to manage the financial implications of the claim as it develops," says Thomson. Creating a reserve supports decisions about expert costs, rehabilitation funding, negotiation timing, and the relative value of settlement options.

When settlements include rehabilitation funding, ongoing support, or periodic payments, a similar approach continues after the agreement. Regular review helps ensure that support remains aligned with assessed needs, identifies issues before they become disputes, and maintains oversight of long-term obligations. Lifetime exposure can be controlled through early intervention, using evidence to refine legal and financial choices at each stage.

Turning Information Into Informed Decisions

An integrated approach supports better judgment at every stage of the claim lifecycle, from initial assessment through to long-term oversight.

"The key is working collaboratively and simultaneously," Thomson says. "Managing large claims involves proactively working together so that everyone is aligned and working toward the same goal." That coordination gives claims handlers, lawyers, investigators, medical experts, and rehabilitation providers a shared view of the evidence and prevents decisions in one area from creating avoidable costs in another.

Gallagher Bassett, through its integrated legal solutions, helps clients make better-informed decisions throughout the claim lifecycle by combining legal, investigative, rehabilitation, and claims insight into a single strategic view of exposure. This ensures potentially significant claims are identified early, supported by the right expertise, and managed with a long-term view of exposure.

Contact our legal solutions specialists to understand how early legal intervention can make a difference.

Author


Leanne Thomson

Leanne Thomson

Partner, Strata Solicitors, a Gallagher Bassett Company

Make Gallagher Bassett your dependable partner

When making the right decision at the right time is critical to minimise risk for your business, count on Gallagher Bassett's extensive experience and global network to deliver.

Connect with Us